|
We wish to invite your kind attention to the fact that Indian
Society for Greek and Roman Studies (ISGARS) in collaboration with
Greek Chair, School of Language Literature and Culture Studies,
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi and some other academic
organizations shall organize Asian Conference on Greek Studies
(22-25 November 2012) at JNU, New Delhi.
The Theme
The discovery of classical Greek knowledge is recognized a
significant factor for the birth of modern Renaissance and the end
of medieval obscurantism in Europe. The west searches for its roots
in Greece. It also traces there, the beginning of many disciplines
developed in the modern world. Within two centuries and a half the
centre of this achievement Athens is said to have given birth to
Solon, Peisistratos, Themistocles, Aristeidis and Pericles among
statesmen, to Aischylos, Sophocles, Euripides and Aristophanes among
playwrights; to Thucydides, the most scientific among historians; to
Demosthenes, the most impressive of orators; to Iktinos, the
architect of Acropolis; to Phidias, the sculptor; to Phormio the
most brilliant naval commander; to Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and
countless others. The statement that the whole of European
philosophy is nothing but a series of footnotes to Plato (Alfred
North Whitehead, Process and Reality, 1929) has become a well
popularized sentiment in the western world.
The spirit of adventurism and curiosity about the world
which had motivated the seafaring Greek citizens of various polis
states to develop an advanced civilization in the ancient world.
From the very beginning of their history they were interacting with
their contemporaries. The Greek immigrants in far off lands founded
colonies where their presence proved to be of momentous consequences
and immensurable significance to humanity. Hundreds of colonies were
founded by many different Greek city states. South Italy and Sicily
were so densely colonized that they became known as Magna Graecia.
Other colonies sprang up in France, Spain and on the Libyan Coast.
Among the colonies founded by the Greeks it was the founding
of Ionia in the central part of West Coast of Asian Minor, which
became a turning point in Greek history and civilization. The Greeks
had infact started making settlements in this part of Asia very
gradually from the 11th century B.C. onward. As the
Ionian Greeks had an opportunity to interact with well known
civilizations then developed in the East, the Greek civilization
took its form in Ionic not in the mainland. The Ionians challenged
the myths and superstitions and developed reason and science. The
origin of philosophy, natural science, history, geography and a
major contribution to poetry and classical architecture are all
associated in Greek civilization with Ionic. Ionian legacy to
Hellenism is firmly established. The imposition to Persian control
over Greek cities of Ionia had brought face to face confrontation in
the city states of the Greeks with the empire of the Achaemenians.
In the freedom enjoyed in the polis system, the Greek citizens had
begun to distinguish themselves with their Persian counterpart,
living as subjects under the despotic rule of their kings. The
victory of the Greeks in Persian wars against Dareios and Xerxes
develop the faith of the Greek citizens in their polis system
against the empire of the barbarians. With Aeschylus’ Persians
(performed in 472 B.C.) a consistent image of the barbarians begins
to appear in art and literature of the Athenians. The
Greek/barbarian polarity continued to be major element in Greek
literature throughout antiquity.
The period that lies between Alexander’s death (323 B.C.)
and the victory of Octavius (later Augusts) at Actium (31 B.C.),
i.e., the Hellenistic Age was the time when Greek culture is said to
have diffused most intensely in different parts of Asia, North
Africa and Southern Italy. It was characterized as the period of
‘Hellenismus’ by a 19th century German scholar J.G.
Droysen. He used ‘Hellinismus’ to refer to the process of fusion
between Greek and not-Greek. The period saw the spread of Greek
culture from the Mediterranean into Asia, as far as modern
Afghanistan, and the Egypt, and its fusion with the native cultures.
The process was fostered by the Graeco-Macedonian rules and
supported by a mass of Greek population which had come as immigrants
to seek their fortunes in the new kingdoms. The rise of Rome and
ultimately the spread of Christianity could become possible only
because of the ground prepared in the Hellenistic world.
In Droysen and post Droysen view of the ancient world there
is arguable neglect of Egyptian and Asian cultures especially the
Semitic contribution to Greek achievements. It created a strong
superior image of Europe, with which Eastern civilization
(especially the Muslim World) can be negatively contrasted.
Greek-Barbarian dichotomy of classical Greeks came into fore to
justify the concepts of ‘Europe’ and ‘Orient’ as polar opposite,
particularly in the context of Europeon imperialism. The orient is
thus presented as effeminate, decadent, corrupt, voluptuous,
despotic and incapable of independent creative development.
The Pro-Droysen “Hellenization of the Orient” approach is
now being scrutinized and radically reassessed. For example in the
domain of art there are phases when Greek, Hellenistic or Byzantine
are appear to adopt stylistic traits characteristics of the Near
East. An extreme reaction of Pro-Droysen view appears in M. Bernal’s
Black Athena (London 1987) He argues vehemently that Greece was
colonized by black Africans and Phoenicians and owed its culture to
them. Beginning in the 11th century B.C. the movements of
Phoenicians had reached its climax in the 9th-8th
century B.C., when Phoenician culture, art, religion and
inscriptions left traces all over the Mediterranean.
The view that the centre of Greek achievements was Athens
in Greece may equally be contrasted. The contribution of the Ionic
cities of Asia Minor to Greek culture was in no way lesser to
Periclean Athens. We cannot imagine the Parthenon without the
stylistic influence of the 6th C.B.C. Ionian temples;
Greek tragedy without Homer; Socrates and Plato without Anaximander,
Herakleitos or Anaxagoras or possibly even Herodotus without the
Ionian geographers and historians. Furthermore in studying the
foundation of rational thought and scientific enquiry laid down in
Ionia, the modern man has the unique opportunity to see the
conceptual framework of his own world in the making.
In the aftermath of Alexander, it was Alexandria in Egypt,
an international port, which had become the torch bearer of
Hellenism. With its great Library and Museum, Alexandria was a city
where Hellenism was in continuous dialogues with then known
civilizations of ancient world. Antiochus in Syria and Pergamum in
Asia Minor were other great centers Hellenism in the Hellenistic
world.
The debate on the Hellenism versus East was going on even in
ancient Greece. Herodotus had found the names of nearly all the gods
in Greece, coming from Egypt. In their search of finding the roots
of Greek culture, the deeper both Plato and Socrates went, the
closer they came to Egypt. They believed that important changes were
brought in the Hellenic culture by the barbarians. Criticizing the
Greek-barbarian divide of the classic Greece, Eratosthenes, the
well-known Hellenistic geographer of Alexandria said that it would
be better to divide the human race by the criterion of virtue and
wickedness than into Greeks and barbarians; for many Greeks are bad
and many barbarians civilized. Among the civilized barbarians he
cited first the Indians, followed by the Romans, Arianes (Persians),
and Carthaginians.
Some Greek writers had begun to credit India instead of
Egypt from where the Greeks derived their knowledge in philosophy.
The credits given to non Greeks were not palatable to authors who
had made a rigid distinction between Greeks and the barbarians.
Thucydides had an aversion with the non-Greeks; he exalted the
uniqueness of the Greek achievements including the destructive ones.
Hellenism had thus no geographical boundary. The western world
identifies itself with it and considers Greece as an integral part
of western civilization. On the other hand there are others
including Greeks, who find Greece as nearer to the original world.
The various non-Greek cultures with which Greece had been
interacting, greatly contributed in making of Hellenism. The legacy
of Hellenism continues to our own days. The image of Hellenism
remains as potent as it was for Bruni, Byron and Delacroinc. For
example it is the romance of Alexander’s achievements in which we
may see the debate around the permissible use of the term
‘Macedonia’. Allied intervention in Greece in World War II relied
more on Churchill’s sentimental vision of Greece’s place in
civilization than on any cold, purely military assessment as the
subsequent inglorious retreat to create and the North Africa
underlined.
Is Hellenism a European phenomenon? Its contribution to
Christianity and the making of modern Europe had greatly valued by
the West. Those who speak clash of civilization should not forget
the role of various Islamic cultures as carriers of Hellenic
elements to west. In fact since its inception Hellenism has been
conversing continuously with diverse civilizations of Asia and
Africa including the religious developed there. Their contribution
in the making of Hellenism has been discussed at great length in
different writings. There had been along Asian traditions on Greek
discourse, which have not been much discussed. The present congress
intends to discuss call those elements which have been instrumental
in developing Hellenism as a universal phenomenon. Some of the areas
which may be taken up for discussions in this congress are as
follows:-
I.
Revisiting the historiography of Discourse on Greece and Asian
Civilizations.
II.
The making of Hellenic culture and its counterparts.
III.
The perception of the past in Greek and Asian thought.
IV.
Rationalism versus irrationalism is Greek and Asian world.
V.
Greek and Asian Mind on the Nature of Universe.
VI.
The tradition of Skepticism in Greek and Asian civilization.
VII.
Greece and Eastern others: Identity and Differences.
VIII.
The Epic Texts in Greek and Asian Literature.
IX.
The Greek and Asian Tradition of Democrat ideals.
X.
Ancient Greek theatre and Theatres of Asia.
XI.
The perception of Greece in Asian Literature.
XII.
The interaction in Art between Greece and the Asian world.
XIII.
Early philosophical understanding in Greek and Asian Cultures.
XIV.
The Encounter of Hellenism with Asian religions.
XV.
Looking and Listening Byzantium.
XVI.
Greco-Roman World and Asia: Voyages and Discoveries.
XVII.
Alexander in Archaeology, literature and folk consciousness of Asia.
XVIII.
Recent Hypothesis on the presence of Greeks after Alexander in
Central Asia and India.
XIX.
Interaction between Greek and Asian World and the enrichment in the
sphere of economy, technology and engineering.
Important Dates
Last Date for submission of Full Paper
31st March 2012
Communication for acceptance
30th
April 2012
Registration Closed
15th June 2012
Communication for Detailed Programme
16th August 2012
Inauguration of
Conference
22nd November 2012
Valedictory session
25th November 2012
CONFERENCE
REGISTRATION FORM
|
Please
complete and return by e-mail, regular mail or fax.
Please
note that the name and title you give here will be printed on your
badge and the participants’ list.
Date:
22nd-25th November 2012
Venue:
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
1. Participants information
Family
name:________________________________________________________________
Title:_______
£
Prof.
£
Dr.
£
other:_________________________£
Mr.
£
Ms.
£
Mrs.
First
name:__________________________________________________________________
Organisation:________________________________________________________________
Address:______________________________________________________________________
Postal/Zip
code:________________________
City:____________________________________
Country:_____________________________________________________________________
Telephone:______________ Fax:___________
E-mail:________________________________
2. Conference Fee
Conference fees include
admission to conference sessions, tea/coffee, lunch, registration
materials and reception to be held during the evening of November 22nd,
2012.
|
South Asian
Participants |
Others |
Observers
|
Students |
|
INR 1500/- |
US$ 200 |
INR 1000/- |
INR 800/- |
3.
Dietary Requirements
Special dietary requirements
for lunch/Dinner:
I am
non-vegetarian/vegetarian/other
(please specify):
4.
Payment
Payment shall be made through Bank Demand Drafts/ Money Orders/Cash
(At Conference Reception Desk) in the name of Indian Society for
Greek and Roman Studies, Payable at Bareilly, India.
5.
Additional Instructions
Deadlines:
Registration Form must be electronically submitted, faxed or mailed
no later than 15th June, 2012. Please use one form per
person. If you should have problems registering, please contact the
convenor.
Payment Information:
Registration forms must be accompanied by full payment in order to
be processed.
Confirmation:
Please
allow 3 days for e-mailed confirmation of your registration.
By sending in this registration form, I acknowledge that I commit
myself to the immediate payment of the full conference fee.
Prof. U.P. Arora
General Secretary, Indian
Society for Greek and Roman Studies
Greek Chair
Professor School of Language, Literature and Culture Studies
Jawaharlal Nehru
University
New Delhi 110067
Mobile No.-
+91-9873673300
E-mail: uparora12@yahoo.co.in
|